New study shows some plant-based diets may raise heart disease riskSummary: Researchers tracking over 63,000 adults found that high-quality, minimally processed plant foods significantly reduce cardiovascular risk. But when those plant foods are ultra-processed, the advantage disappears—and can even backfire. Some ultra-processed plant diets increased risk by 40%. The study urges a shift toward whole, naturally nutrient-rich plant foods. FULL STORY Not all plant-based diets improve heart health—only those built on minimally processed, nutrient-dense foods do. Ultra-processed plant products can erase the benefits and even increase cardiovascular risk. Credit: Shutterstock Previous studies have indicated that eating large amounts of ultra-processed foods[1] is linked with a higher likelihood of developing cardiovascular diseases. Other research[2] has found that diets centered on plant-based foods can lower this risk when those foods offer balanced nutrition and are consumed in appropriate proportions. To explore how nutrition relates to cardiovascular health in more detail, scientists from INRAE, Inserm, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, and Cnam examined more than whether foods came from plant or animal sources. Their assessment also incorporated the nutritional makeup of foods, including factors such as carbohydrate, fat, and antioxidant vitamin and mineral content, along with the level of industrial processing involved. How the Study Evaluated Diets and Food Choices The team evaluated data from 63,835 adults enrolled in the French NutriNet-Santé cohort. Participants were followed for an average of 9.1 years, with some tracked for as long as 15 years. Information on what they ate and drank (collected over at least three days) was gathered through online questionnaires. This detailed approach allowed researchers to classify diets based on the share of plant-based and animal-based foods, while also considering both nutritional quality and processing level. The findings showed that adults who consumed more plant-based foods of higher nutritional quality (lower in fat, sugar, and salt) and with minimal industrial processing had about a 40 percent lower risk of cardiovascular disease compared with those who ate fewer nutritious plant-based foods and more animal-based products[3]. However, people who ate larger amounts of plant-based foods that were nutritionally higher quality but ultra-processed, including items such as industrial whole meal breads, store-bought soups, ready-made pasta dishes, or commercially prepared salads with dressing, did not experience a reduced cardiovascular risk relative to individuals who consumed fewer of these products and more animal-based foods. Ultra-Processed Plant Foods and Increased Heart Disease Risk A notably higher risk emerged for adults whose diets were dominated by plant-based foods that were both lower in nutritional quality and ultra-processed. These items included crisps, sweetened fruit drinks or sodas made from plant extracts, chocolate-based sweets or confectionery, sugary breakfast cereals, and savory biscuits. Their cardiovascular disease risk was roughly 40 percent higher than that of people who consumed more plant-based foods of good nutritional quality with little or no industrial processing. Why Processing Level Matters for Plant-Based Eating Overall, the results show that understanding the relationship between diet and cardiovascular health requires considering the nutritional quality of foods and how heavily they are processed, in addition to the balance of plant-based and animal-based components. These findings support public health recommendations that encourage the consumption of plant-based foods that are both nutritionally high quality and minimally processed (such as fresh, frozen, or high-quality canned fruits and vegetables without added fats, salt, sugar, or additives). Notes [1], [2], and [3] can be read at the article source.... ARTICLE SOURCE: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/12/251214100928.htm
Wanted to start a dedicated thread on this, as I am still learning, and have more questions than answers, but a bit of experience to bring to the table. Sorry in advance if this gets long.
I am two years in on the carnivore diet, and (to my knowledge) properly fat adapted. I can consume fats with relative abandon with no restroom related "side effects" shall we say.
As a type1 diabetic, I can definitely spend a good portion of anyone's time singing the praises of what I have been informed is something called gluconeogenesis, as it keeps me from having to carry sweet snacks always at the ready. I can work along, and not worry about low blood glucose most of the time, even as a type1. I have proven to myself that a zero carb diet is the way to health, especially with type1 in the mix, but I dont wish this thread to be isolated to those with a specific knowledge of diabetic physiology. As an additional thought, wearing a CGM (continuous glucose monitor) allows me to get a different perspective on what is happening as my body processes different foods and situations. Its my hope that some of this may be a help to others (as well as yours truly!)
Many folks here speak about being kicked out of ketosis if they consume carbs or sugars, and while I notice this myself, I ALSO notice that if I eat anything that contains sugar or carbohydrates, it will seemingly hamper my gluconeogenesis abilities, and I will drop terribly low in the hours following the compromised meal. This is as opposed to the normal days where I have eaten "clean" and my glucose level will drop to say, 70 and then self correct and I can go right on working (or sleeping) like its nothing.
I have been trying to get a straight story from all my internet searches (heh, get in line, right?!) ...so wanted to poll the community here for everyone's thoughts.
In another thread (that I didnt want to hijack) Bob spoke about "adaptive glucose sparing" and some of it's effects.
Here are my observations, please critique, or add to these with your thoughts!
- When I have been able to keep my diet SPOTLESSLY clean for many days in a row (no cheats, ever) my sugar levels seem to stay right on target and I feel simply amazing! I have been under the assumption that me being properly fat adapted, I am in these times reaping the benefits of adaptive glucose sparing.
Something that I am beginning to suspect, is that adaptive glucose sparing is akin to ketosis in that a dietary change can "kick us out" for a while. Is this at all correct?
I further notice that *sometimes * when I fast for any longer than one meal, my glucose levels can sometimes rise and stay elevated as if I just ate an oreo cookie! This happened most recently at a dr visit, and I was amazed at how high my glucose level was (145) even though I had not eaten anything for nearly 24 hours! ( @Geezy has made a comment in a recent post suggesting that I may have fasted too long before the appointment, which can throw your numbers off?) Anyway, I say *sometimes, because it doesnt seem to be a hard and fast rule, and on other occasions I can go for days and not have my sugar level rise at ALL, even with fasting!
There are also many regular days when no fasting is going on, and my diet has been a proper balance of meats and fats, but I throw some cheese in, I notice that after my midday meal, my sugar level goes up considerably as if I was back on the cookies again! Ill be sitting there later on thinking to myself "what the heck did I EAT??!!" as my blood sugar level is going up past 175! I have so far attributed this discrepancy to diet (perhaps as a result of eating things like cheese maybe?) and that in these times I am experiencing gluconeogenesis without the benefit of adaptive glucose sparing? Am I on the right track here?
Is the cheese (or even a small amount of dairy) enough to shut down adaptive glucose sparing to the point that my body begins creating a sizeable amount of glucose from the protein I just ate? Does it work like this? It certainly seems like it, but these are the questions I have in my head day to day.
Lastly, I hear just a bit about a process from time to time called glycogenolysis, that is similar to gluconeogenesis, but is instead the body's conversion of glycogen to glucose.
Is glycogenolysis actually what is saving me during the times I would drop "low"?
According to the internet at large, a high fat diet increases insulin resistance, but I have experienced my insulin resistance going DOWN as a result of carnivore, as well as my A1C.
Okay, Im done for a minute. Please let me know your thoughts!