New study shows some plant-based diets may raise heart disease riskSummary: Researchers tracking over 63,000 adults found that high-quality, minimally processed plant foods significantly reduce cardiovascular risk. But when those plant foods are ultra-processed, the advantage disappears—and can even backfire. Some ultra-processed plant diets increased risk by 40%. The study urges a shift toward whole, naturally nutrient-rich plant foods. FULL STORY Not all plant-based diets improve heart health—only those built on minimally processed, nutrient-dense foods do. Ultra-processed plant products can erase the benefits and even increase cardiovascular risk. Credit: Shutterstock Previous studies have indicated that eating large amounts of ultra-processed foods[1] is linked with a higher likelihood of developing cardiovascular diseases. Other research[2] has found that diets centered on plant-based foods can lower this risk when those foods offer balanced nutrition and are consumed in appropriate proportions. To explore how nutrition relates to cardiovascular health in more detail, scientists from INRAE, Inserm, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, and Cnam examined more than whether foods came from plant or animal sources. Their assessment also incorporated the nutritional makeup of foods, including factors such as carbohydrate, fat, and antioxidant vitamin and mineral content, along with the level of industrial processing involved. How the Study Evaluated Diets and Food Choices The team evaluated data from 63,835 adults enrolled in the French NutriNet-Santé cohort. Participants were followed for an average of 9.1 years, with some tracked for as long as 15 years. Information on what they ate and drank (collected over at least three days) was gathered through online questionnaires. This detailed approach allowed researchers to classify diets based on the share of plant-based and animal-based foods, while also considering both nutritional quality and processing level. The findings showed that adults who consumed more plant-based foods of higher nutritional quality (lower in fat, sugar, and salt) and with minimal industrial processing had about a 40 percent lower risk of cardiovascular disease compared with those who ate fewer nutritious plant-based foods and more animal-based products[3]. However, people who ate larger amounts of plant-based foods that were nutritionally higher quality but ultra-processed, including items such as industrial whole meal breads, store-bought soups, ready-made pasta dishes, or commercially prepared salads with dressing, did not experience a reduced cardiovascular risk relative to individuals who consumed fewer of these products and more animal-based foods. Ultra-Processed Plant Foods and Increased Heart Disease Risk A notably higher risk emerged for adults whose diets were dominated by plant-based foods that were both lower in nutritional quality and ultra-processed. These items included crisps, sweetened fruit drinks or sodas made from plant extracts, chocolate-based sweets or confectionery, sugary breakfast cereals, and savory biscuits. Their cardiovascular disease risk was roughly 40 percent higher than that of people who consumed more plant-based foods of good nutritional quality with little or no industrial processing. Why Processing Level Matters for Plant-Based Eating Overall, the results show that understanding the relationship between diet and cardiovascular health requires considering the nutritional quality of foods and how heavily they are processed, in addition to the balance of plant-based and animal-based components. These findings support public health recommendations that encourage the consumption of plant-based foods that are both nutritionally high quality and minimally processed (such as fresh, frozen, or high-quality canned fruits and vegetables without added fats, salt, sugar, or additives). Notes [1], [2], and [3] can be read at the article source.... ARTICLE SOURCE: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/12/251214100928.htm
States Are Taking Action Against Lab-Grown 'Meat'
by Chris Queen | 11:46 AM on May 19, 2025
Photo and steak by the author.
As a red-blooded American male, I believe that there’s nothing like a good steak (just like the one in the featured image from the estimable VodkaPundit), some fried chicken, pulled pork, or shrimp off the grill. I’m blessed to have several farm stores near me that allow me to get the best quality meat.
One thing that won’t touch my lips as long as I can help it is lab-grown “meat.” It sounds gross, and it can’t be as good as real meat. Thankfully, a growing chorus of states is taking action regarding the nasty stuff, and Montana is the latest state to do so.
Gov. Greg Gianforte (R-Mont.) signed HB401 into law at the beginning of this month; that law bans the manufacture, sale, and distribution of lab-grown “meat.”
“If you’ve ever had the pleasure of enjoying a cut of Montana beef, you know there is no substitute,” Gianforte announced in a press release. “By signing House Bill 401 into law, I am proud to defend our way of life and the hardworking Montana ranchers who produce the best beef in the world.”
Additionally, National Hog Farmer reports that “Indiana took another route this week, issuing a two-year moratorium on the products from July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2027. Following the temporary ban, cultivated meat products will then be required to display the phrase ‘this is an imitation meat product.’”
Nebraska has a bill in front of its legislature that would outlaw cultivated meat products, although some legislators are trying to amend the bill to make it a labeling requirement rather than a ban. Alabama, Mississippi, and Florida have enacted legislation targeting lab-grown “meat.”
Of course, the biggest argument in favor of lab-grown “meat” is that it’s more sustainable than real meat, but organizations like the Center for the Environment and Welfare and a study from the University of California, Davis say otherwise. The UC Davis study discovered that the potential for global warming (so take it with a grain of salt) from fake meat creation in a lab is anywhere from four to 25 times higher!
“The lab-grown meat sector will continue to face headwinds as consumers and lawmakers learn more about the use of ‘immortalized cells’ and the lack of long-term nutritional and health studies around the product," Jack Hubbard, CEW executive director, told National Hog Farmer. “We are seeing a bipartisan consumer movement against the experimental product that we believe will intensify as more learn about how lab-grown meat is manufactured."
I’m glad states are taking action, and I hope more states will follow suit. At the absolute least, consumers ought to know what they’re getting. But ideally, nasty fake meat from a lab should never make it onto store shelves.
You can help us in our calling to report the truth with the conservative perspective you crave and a dash of style by becoming a PJ Media VIP.
Our VIPs are the lifeblood of what we do, and they invest in our mission — plus they receive some great rewards, including exclusive content, podcasts, an ad-free experience, and commenting privileges.
It’s a great time to become a VIP because you can get 60% off your VIP membership when you use the code FIGHT. Come join us!
Chris Queen is an editor and columnist at PJ Media. He's a UGA alum (#DGD), a fan of anything involving his beloved Georgia Bulldogs, and an amateur Disney historian. He's a Certified Bourbon Steward, but that doesn't make him a bourbon snob.
Subscribe to his Substack (for free), buy his book Neon Crosses, and follow him on X. For media inquiries, please contact *****@*****.tld.
Read more by Chris Queen
ARTICLE SOURCE: https://pjmedia.com/chris-queen/2025/05/19/states-are-taking-action-against-lab-grown-meat-n4939937
Subscribe to Carnivore Talk on YouTube | Be our guest on the channel | Leave me a voicemail, yo!