List of foods ‘worse for you than smoking’ as doctor issues serious warningYou might need to make some changes to your weekly shop James Moorhouse Here's a list of foods that you might want to keep in mind the next time you do your weekly shop. While appearing on the Diary of a CEO podcast, NHS doctor Chris van Tulleken suggested that ultra-processed foods (UPFS) have 'overtaken tobacco as the leading cause of early death on planet Earth'. He even went as far as to claim they should be classed as 'industrially processed edible substances' rather than food. According to the British Heart Foundation, ultra-processed foods often contain additives and ingredients not common in everyday cooking, such as preservatives, emulsifiers, sweeteners, and artificial colours and flavours. As well as this, they also tend to have high levels of saturated fat, salt and sugar, and it's been previously suggested that the additives in UPFS may negatively impact our health. Dr Chris van Tulleken spoke about the health impacts of ultra-processed foods (YouTube/Diary of a CEO) A 2024 review from the British Medical Journal (BMJ) looking at 10 million participants over 45 studies suggests that eating more ultra-processed foods could lead to a higher mortality rate and has some connections to conditions like heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and mental health disorders. So what foods should we avoid on our big shop if we want to truly treat our body as a temple? Supermarket breadEven though we've all been told growing up that wholemeal and brown bread is good for us, the reality is that none of the mass-produced stuff is particularly good for the body, and a quick look at the often gigantic ingredient lists might give you a clue as to why. According to the National Library of Medicine, bread also accounts for 11 per cent of the calories we ingest, so it's worth getting some that has minimal additives to help you limit the amount of UPFs you consume. The good news here is that it should encourage you to visit your local bakery for some fresh bread that not only tastes way nicer, but is also clearly far better for your health. Failing that, we can all go back five years in time and start making our own sourdoughs again. You might be better off in a bakery (Getty Stock) Energy drinksWhile they might be the go-to before an early work shift or after a gym session, energy drinks aren't always what they are made out to be. According to Harvard Health, energy drinks contain caffeine and sugar, and a Consumer Reports study found that 27 energy drinks contained between six and 242 milligrams per serving. As with anything, moderation is key to avoiding serious issues; the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) says 400 mg per day is usually safe for adults. However, regular consumption can lead to serious health issues, particularly for the heart. UC Davis Health says energy drinks can cause irregular heart rhythm, as well as an increased heart rate and blood pressure, which are both risk factors of heart disease. Energy drinks often have a ton of caffeine in them (Getty stock images) Breakfast cerealsThe biggest culprit in most breakfast cereals is added sugar. According to the NHS, eating too much sugar can cause weight gain and tooth decay. Meanwhile, Assistant Professor of Nutrition and Dietetics at the University of North Dakota, Nathaniel Johnson, said in The Conversation that consuming sugary cereal can increase hunger and trigger greater insulin release, which could contribute to the development of heart disease and type 2 diabetes. The recommended amount of sugar for an adult is no more than 30g a day, while for children, it is 24 grams. While you can find some low-sugar or minimally processed options, such as porridge and bran flakes, adding additional sugars and sweeteners impairs their health benefits, according to a 2025 study on the National Library of Medicine. Breakfast cereals are often high in sugar (Getty Stock) Hot dogsA staple at sports matches, particularly in the UK and the US, the humble hot dog is one of the earliest examples of a UPF. The World Health Organisation (WHO) classifies processed meats, including ham, bacon, and hot dogs, as part of a Group 1 carcinogen, which is known to cause cancer. The NHS says that eating a lot of processed and red meat is linked with an increased risk of bowel cancer. Meanwhile, Lakeview Cardiology of Texas says processed sausages tend to be high in saturated fats, sodium, and chemical preservatives like nitrates and nitrites, which are linked to an increased risk of heart disease and hypertension. Sausages, like hot dogs, can be highly processed (Getty Stock) Vegan meat and cheeseVegans love to tell you how healthy they are, and often they're not wrong, as they can follow a more natural diet that focuses on fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and nuts. However, if they still want the taste of bacon without the guilty conscience, they might have to settle for some ultra-processed options, which aren't exactly the healthiest. These meat substitutes often contain additives and emulsifiers that make plant proteins look and taste as much like meat as possible. According to the British Heart Foundation, vegan meat alternatives are high in added fats, salt, sugar, and artificial ingredients. The same goes for dairy alternatives, like vegan cheese, which is also low in protein and calcium. Vegan meat alternative might not be so healthy after all (Getty stock images) Chicken nuggetsThe go-to meal for a fussy child or a hungover student, we've probably all heard the horror stories about what's actually inside chicken nuggets. While the meat content varies by brand, you're likely to find a combination of tendons, skin, bone, collagen, and fat inside the delicious treat. Protein levels are therefore lower, and the end result is often high in fat, sugar and salt. How they are cooked is also something to consider, as WebMD reports that nuggets are cooked in hydrogenated oil, which is high in fat and preservatives. Nuggets might be tasty but they're rarely healthy (Getty Stock) Reformulated potato snacksThis feels like a fancy way of saying 'crisps', and that's essentially it: many of the salty snacks we love to enjoy alongside our pints contain dehydrated processed potato, refined vegetable oils, rice and wheat flour, emulsifiers, salt and colouring. The National University of Singapore says that a diet high in trans-fat could lead to obesity, heart disease, and liver disease. Regularly consuming fried potato snacks in general, including chips, also increases the chance of a type 2 diabetes diagnosis, according to Harvard University researchers. Their study on the BMJ says that 'the high starch content of potatoes, leading to a high glycemic index and load, combined with possible loss of nutrients and possible health risks resulting from various cooking methods, could contribute to adverse health outcomes'. Potato snacks are high in additives and salts (Getty Stock) MargarineThe British Heart Foundation says that butter contains around 50 per cent saturated fat, while margarine is 50 per cent less. However, margarine is high in unsaturated fats as it combines vegetable oils, like sunflower, olive, and rapeseed, with small amounts of oils, such as palm or coconut, to make it solid. Margarine is also considered an ultra-processed food, as extra ingredients, like emulsifiers and artificial colours, are also added. It is important to note that both butter and margarine are processed foods; therefore, it is recommended to check the labels for fat and salt content. Margarine can have a few additional ingredients (Getty Stock) Ready mealsAs previously mentioned, things that are quick and easy to make are rarely going to have good ingredients, and while it's a hammer blow to students and tired workers everywhere, the ready meal is included in that. According to Action on Salt, last year, one in five ready meals contained high levels of salt and saturated fat. "Excess salt consumption is directly linked to high blood pressure, heart disease, and stroke," they write. Dr Helen Flaherty, Registered Public Health Nutritionist and Director of Health Promotion and Education at Heart Research UK, told The i Paper in 2024 that regular consumption of ready meals can contribute to weight gain, high blood pressure, and cholesterol levels, which increases the risk of coronary heart disease. Ready meals can be full of fat (Getty stock images) How to cut down on ultra-processed foodWhile there is evidence suggesting the negative impacts of consistently eating ultra-processed foods, the British Heart Foundation says it is still unclear whether we need to cut them out entirely. Plus, according to the NHS, not all processed foods are made equally and looking at food labels can help when it comes to choosing what to eat. The British Heart Foundation also recommends swapping processed versions for healthier options, such as fruit, vegetables, fish, and unsaturated oils. ARTICLE SOURCE: https://www.ladbible.com/news/health/doctor-health-warning-smoking-ultra-processed-foods-351011-20260324
Featured by Guest
I have made note of carnivore, fasting and trying to hit protein targets. I have altered the fat content and found pretty much where I need to be.
I have also noted I am amazed by the amounts of food other people can eat in one setting. Once I get past a 3/4"-1" rib eye, I'm full and sometimes can manage to eat the other half of my wife's steak, but that can be a stretch. I have tried to hit protein targets as I am getting more and more into lifting at the gym.
The past few weeks I have been on a stretch of overtime. I am averaging just a tad over 66 hours per week. I have been using some of the time on nights to pursue my Google degree in Carnivore and my YouTube College of Medicine Certificate with a lot of the metabolic things that come along with the carnivore diet, fasting and lifting weights (with an autoimmune disease tossed in as well). I'm not close to graduating from either Google nor Youtube, but I am working on those degrees.
I read a ton on the sugar diet (not that I am interested but more so to read about the effects of sugar). I have read a ton on glucose, glycogen, the liver and the pancreas as well as insulin resistance and insulin sensitivity. Instead of watching other people give their (mostly biased) opinions on studies and medical papers I decided to read theirs and then conduct my own experiments on myself. (Maybe inspired by Nick Norwitz, ??)
My first conclusion is that after going without sugar for 13-14 months the least little bit of sugar triggers hunger signals like I have not had in forever. As noted, I am trying to hit protein targets, and I simply can't eat that amount of meat to get to 200 grams of protein. For weight loss and using fat for energy this is a good thing. For weight/muscle gain I don't think I am fueling up as well as I need. I had some ideas and tried to kill two birds with one stone. I bought some of the pre-mixed protein drinks. I tried one, and then waited a week to try another, and then another after the third week. This container has 2.5 servings per bottle and I drank half of it and then 12 hours later the other half.
Rockin' Protein - Shamrock Farms
It has 20grams of carbohydrates and 11 grams of sugar so I'm getting them at 10 and 6 per serving.
Within an hour of each serving I am as hungry as all get out. It does not feel like an old sugar craving as I didn't really have any of those going to carnivore. But I can remember always feeling a little bit hungry. 5-6-7 20oz Mountain Dews and multiple snack cakes thru the day was providing me with the sugar to make my brain say, "I'm hungry again". I am guessing (hypothesizing if this were truly scientific) that by being off sugar/carbs for so long it only takes a very small amount to take me back to "hungry" all over again. (I have found a similar issues with seed oils. I ate them by the buckets before Carnivore and now the least little bit sends me running to the bathroom).
The sugar and the carbs have been a tradeoff for appetite and getting in extra protein. My weight fluctuates/swings normally and that has continued. Maybe up a pound or two more but swings back down to where I am averaging around 215. (still 90lbs off my start point on carnivore).
I could stand to lose some more weight, maybe 15-20lbs or so, but I am not as concerned with weight loss as of late. Super happy with the 90-95lbs in 14 months. Carnivore is still my way of eating, and as far as food is concerned it is still strict carnivore. Once a week or so I am indulging in a few carbs and a few sugars which triggers some hunger. I get the benefit of the extra protein from the drink but at the same time I can get in one more rib eye due to the hunger it provides. Probably not the best method to trigger hunger, but since I never had cravings, I don't see it being my 'gate-way' drug back to Mountain Dews and Little Debbie Snack cakes. LOL
The return? In the past month I can see a difference in my biceps and triceps. And although the aesthetics is not the goal, it is pretty cool to gain a little muscle at 55. The end goal is to gain muscle to offset the natural muscle loss from aging as well as the effects of the auto-immune disease I am trying to reverse with carnivore. The most impressive part so far is the plates I am adding in the gym. I am a lot stronger at 55 than 35. I am not 25 and just out of the service healthy but I am a lot closer to that than I was 14 months ago. And there has been some strides in the last month with "sugar dosing".
If I were struggling with weight still, I might not see this as a grand idea but since I am good with my weight right now, I don't see the harm of the occasional sugar spike. (This is similar to a four-year carnivore friend at the gym who eats sweet potatoes on Thursday nights before a big lift on Friday. Really similar concepts).
Again, not one of those double-blind studies with a thousand humans as control subjects, just me, and my approach to my own health. Maybe not the best plan, but it is my plan, and for now it is working rather well.
babbling on again.
Scott