Foods that Americans were told to avoid for decades are back under Trump's new nutrition rules

By Andrea Margolis

Published  January 18, 2026 11:01am PST

Foods that Americans were advised to avoid for decades are back on shopping lists — following updated federal dietary guidance released under President Donald Trump's administration.

After years of being told to avoid full-fat dairy, red meat and saturated fats like butter and beef tallow, the White House said updated guidance no longer broadly discourages those foods when consumed in moderation.

The changes reflect revisions to federal nutrition recommendations developed through the Departments of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Agriculture (USDA), rather than a wholesale reversal of prior advice.

Image: Dietary Guidelines for Americans, Department of Health & Human Services

It doesn't mean that every fatty food is encouraged. For example, experts still caution against eating too many processed snacks that are high in saturated fat such as chips, cookies and ice cream.

HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said he was "ending the war on saturated fats" — though the updated report continues to recommend limits on daily intake.

"Protein and healthy fats are essential and were wrongly discouraged in prior dietary guidelines," he said.

Here's a handy summary of which foods are back — and how federal guidance and nutrition experts say they should be consumed.

1. Full-fat milk and yogurt 

The new 2025–2030 Dietary Guidelines for Americans describe full-fat milk and yogurt as "healthy fats."

"In general, saturated fat consumption should not exceed 10% of total daily calories," the report states. 

"Significantly limiting highly processed foods will help meet this goal. More high-quality research is needed to determine which types of dietary fats best support long-term health."

Full-fat dairy is packed with fat-soluble vitamins such as vitamin A, D, E and K, which "allows for better transportation and absorption," said Amy Goldsmith, a Maryland-based registered dietitian and owner of Kindred Nutrition. 

"There can also be an increased satiation from the products, as the fat will decrease [the hormone] ghrelin," she told Fox News Digital.

Goldsmith noted saturated fat should still be portioned, even if not completely cut out. 

"This is the nuance with the new dietary guidelines," she said. "As dietitians, we want to ensure this visualization [doesn't lead] to an increase in saturated fat, as it could contribute to an increase in chronic disease."

There's usually less added sugar in full-fat products, she noted, but they still need to be portioned out to avoid the consumption of too much saturated fat and total calories.

2. Butter 

The Trump administration's new report lists butter as one of several fats that may be used in cooking, while prioritizing unsaturated oils.

"When cooking with or adding fats to meals, prioritize oils with essential fatty acids, such as olive oil," according to the guidelines. "Other options can include butter or beef tallow."

Goldsmith said butter is a great source of vitamin A, which is "essential for vision and immune health."

It also has vitamin E, an antioxidant, and vitamin K2 — which "ensures calcium is used to strengthen bones and teeth."

"It also is the best source of butyric acid, which serves as an anti-inflammatory," Goldsmith said.

"Most butters are 60–70% saturated fat… so it will be difficult to keep total saturated fat intake within recommended limits if portion and volume aren't taken into consideration," she added. 

"In addition, if someone already has a high LDL cholesterol, butter would not be the best source of spread as it can continue to contribute to increasing LDL."

3. Beef tallow

Beef tallow is high in vitamin A, D, E and K, similar to other animal-based fats.

Goldsmith also noted that 40–50% of beef tallow is monounsaturated fat, a proportion comparable to some plant-based oils.

"The other 50% is saturated fat, however. So once again, serving size and volume need to be considered to keep saturated fat below 10% of total calories," she said. 

"In addition, beef tallow can be more expensive than butter and difficult to get."

4. Red meat

Red meat contains essential amino acids that can't be produced by the human body, a dietitian said. (Getty Images)

The new report recommends "[consuming] a variety of protein foods from animal sources, including eggs, poultry, seafood and red meat, as well as a variety of plant-sourced protein foods, including beans, peas, lentils, legumes, nuts, seeds and so."

Goldsmith noted that red meat contains all nine of the essential amino acids that can't be produced by the human body alone.

"About 60% of the iron in meat is heme iron, and it's one of the best sources of zinc," she said. 

"Heme iron is absorbed into the gut fast, which means it can rapidly restore ferritin, your iron stores." 

Red meat's zinc is also crucial for immune cells and inflammation control.

"The new dietary guidelines stuck with the recommendation to keep saturated fat below 10% and, on average, red meat is 40–45% saturated fat," Goldsmith said.

"It will be important to vary animal protein to keep the saturated fat number down as high saturated fat diets contribute to heart disease and cancers."

Read more from FOX News Digital

ARTICLE SOURCE: https://www.ktvu.com/news/foods-americans-were-told-avoid-decades-back-under-trumps-new-nutrition-rules

Since the food pyramid flip a few weeks ago I have began to wonder......

Will it be as easy to sell it this time as it was last time?

It has to be one of the greatest marketing efforts in the history of man.

Scott

11 hours ago, Scott F. said:

Will it be as easy to sell it this time as it was last time?

I hope so, simply because while it's not perfect, it is a step in the right direction. You have to be a moron to take issue with the message "eat real food" and to minimize or eliminate heavily processed food.

But there will be opposition. I am already seeing it on my feeds and in shorts/reels/tiktoks, lol. Mostly from die-hard vegetarians, cardiologists who hold traditional views, and people with Trump Derangement Syndrome (the types that if MAGA or MAHA would say breathing oxygen is good for you, they would try to hold their breath ).

Agreed. I guess the double edge sword could have more than two sides now.

"I'm from the government and I am here to help" has made people weary of any government since the first vote was cast.

People have so much more information at their fingertips now one would think the movement to 'eat real food' would have been in much more of a snowball coming down a mountain getting bigger and bigger.

Clinical research is only factual and useful if it fits the predisposition. If a clinical paper came out and gave factual information about carnivore/keto/low carb/eat real food was actually harmful I would read it (or as much as I could stand to read as they are long, drawn out and take 888 pages to get to what I am interested in reading about) and try to see the reasoning. And then I would look back and see how much it has helped me and continue on my current path, mostly thinking there must be some differences between me and the test subjects. And for me, carnivore it will be.

The flipside is the opposite is true as well. The old school cardiologist will always look at us with disdain and know in his heart we are digging our own grave with a fork.

And then the third side of the double edged sword is that people will not simply slow down to do better. 20 minutes prepping tomorrow's meal is an eternity compared to three minutes in the drive-thru.

And the fourth side is that 99% of food industry is based on sugar and process flours/grains. The next question for the consumer will be how will they figure out how to sneak the sugar back in to keep us addicted.

Remember, "I'm here from the government, and I am here to help.

Scott

It’s a good start but I’m skeptical that anything will change much. I’m afraid that big food has too big an influence in politics.

I hope I’m wrong.

Yep.

"the most money wins' rings true in a lot of things.

People will find a way to keep the big green monster rolling.

The old food pyramid was built with money in mind and it worked beautifully, maybe even the greatest marketing ploy in the history.

I'm hopeful in one sense but sort of doubtful in another.

Scott

On 1/21/2026 at 11:13 AM, Geezy said:

I’m afraid that big food has too big an influence

On 1/22/2026 at 4:04 PM, Scott F. said:

The old food pyramid was built with money in mind

Interesting comments. I could see "Big Food" now developing products that they market as "real food" and they will jump on the bandwagon and steal that slogan "eat real food".

"Look! My ultra-processed food product is made with ingredients primarily derived from meat, dairy, and vegetables. May contain less than 2% of blah blah blah" lol

We were having this conversation in our break room the other night and I heard a comment that I am not sure of the accuracy but, ......

A restaurant chain bought a company called "Real Beef" and then could advertise our meat is "real beef' even if it had fillers and additives. They could use the play on words to mislead people.

I don't know if it is really true but I can see how easy that would work.

Scott

There is a city in Japan called USA,,, ,,,

My how “times” have changed. 😉

On 1/24/2026 at 1:21 PM, Scott F. said:

A restaurant chain bought a company called "Real Beef" and then could advertise our meat is "real beef' even if it had fillers and additives. They could use the play on words to mislead people.

I don't know if it is really true but I can see how easy that would work.

I don't know the accuracy of this either. I've heard it over the years though. I am inclined to think it's a joke but it would be easy to fact check, lol.