Aldous Huxley was far ahead of his time; probably more than he even knew himself. Born in the late 1800s and living until the 1960s, he wrote the book "Brave New World" That showed how people could be enslaved and controlled by making a society that was so comfortable and devoid of meaning that they didn't even realize they were slaves in the first place.

This insight, into modern medical science shows exactly what we have become, which is an institution of disease management, and as you can't manage diseases that don't exist, and managing those diseases is really big money, the design of the system is never to cure, and may even be rife with examples of making things worse. As Mr Huxley said this nearly 100 years ago, imagine what he would think of the world today?

Unfortunately the incentive model is completely backwards, instead of rewarding people for curing diseases we are now rewarding people for maintaining those diseases, and even perpetuating those diseases, as the medications to make you feel more comfortable are so profitable, and they act as a tithe on the entire population who has to constantly pay a significant portion of their income to just try to make their medical issues bearable.

Have you noticed the same thing in your medical care? What clinicians here have seen the same thing, and who is going to help Change the system back to what it used to be and is supposed to be?, below and let me know your thoughts.

Anthony Chaffee

How do we get medicine, research, education etc to be non profit?

On 5/7/2025 at 3:13 PM, Miranda said:

How do we get medicine, research, education etc to be non profit?

It's a struggle for sure.

Basically, we need people whose LOVE for people, for knowledge, and for truth to volunteer their time and resources. But for most of us, time is limited, and time is money. So subsidizing it through voluntary donations and or fund drives is the only thing I can think of.

It's a little harder to think this way here in the USA where the almighty dollar rules everything.

It is funny to me that is how much of us think.

Every study I read just as I get into the content, as well as the intent, I start thinking about which side of the fence funded the study. And in turn, if the study "supports" the "funders" it sort of loses a little bit of its luster.

If it goes against the grain a bit I think 'maybe a little unbiased honesty?".

Scott

Studies are not worth reading.

Ed goeke

Bart Kay and alot of other drs say the same thing.

Trust yourself and your gut.